Skip to content

Comparison Guides

What Big Picture Is

  • Release governance + update decisions + licensing leases
  • Deployable as SaaS or vendor self-host (vendor controls keys when self-hosted)
  • Supports vendor-controlled downstream mirrors so regulated end-customers can self-host artifacts and updates
  • Licensing via server-issued short-lived leases (PASETO v4.public), cloud or local license server

What Big Picture is not

  • Not an installer technology
  • Not an endpoint-management/MDM replacement
  • Not a patch content “catalog” vendor for third-party apps

Each comparison focuses on:

  1. Primary use case & buyer (Dev, IT, Security, Procurement)
  2. Core strengths
  3. Where Big Picture differs
  4. Complementary integration points
  5. Suggested positioning language

Windows

macOS


Big Picture vs Update Frameworks (Squirrel, Sparkle, WinSparkle)

Section titled “Big Picture vs Update Frameworks (Squirrel, Sparkle, WinSparkle)”
  • Frameworks solve: “how does one app update itself?”
  • Big Picture solves: “how does an org govern updates across products/tenants, with policy, signing, mirrors, and licensing?”

Big Picture vs Enterprise IT Deployment (Intune/SCCM)

Section titled “Big Picture vs Enterprise IT Deployment (Intune/SCCM)”
  • Intune/SCCM solve: “how does IT deploy software to managed endpoints?”
  • Big Picture solves: “how does the vendor safely publish evergreen updates with tenant policy + licensing?”
  • Big Picture integrates by offering MANAGED_BY_IT mode and packaging outputs for Intune/SCCM.
  • Flexera/Revenera solve: “packaging, vulnerability/patch workflows, license monetization at scale”
  • Big Picture solves: “developer-first evergreen updates + signed decisioning + vendor-controlled mirrors + lease licensing”
  • Big Picture aims to be lighter, faster to integrate, and easier to operate for software vendors (not ITAM teams).